Category talk:Traitors: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: sourceedit
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== A lil' bit too biased? ==
== A lil' bit too biased? ==
Surely "traitor" is a little too subjective for a category — one side's traitor is another's hero. I mean, just take a look at ''[[The Daleks' Master Plan (TV story)|The Daleks' Master Plan]]''. Here's a list of all the people that were called traitor in that serial (the ones that I caught, anyway):
Surely "traitor" is a little too subjective for a category — one side's traitor is another's hero. I mean, just take a look at ''[[The Daleks' Master Plan (TV story)|The Daleks' Master Plan]]''. Here's a list of all the people that were called traitor in that serial (the ones that I caught, anyway):
* [[Zephon]] (self-applied)
* [[Zephon (The Daleks' Master Plan)|Zephon]] (self-applied)
* [[Bret Vyon]] (by [[Mavic Chen]] and [[Lizan]], and later [[Sara Kingdom]])
* [[Bret Vyon]] (by [[Mavic Chen]] and [[Lizan]], and later [[Sara Kingdom]])
* [[Kert Gantry]] (by Chen and Lizan)
* [[Kert Gantry]] (by Chen and Lizan)
Line 9: Line 9:
Practically the entire cast is at some point named a traitor by the opposing side!
Practically the entire cast is at some point named a traitor by the opposing side!


Now. Let's see who in that whole list actually has the [[:category:traitors|traitor category]] applied: of course, Daxtar and Chen. This is ''extremely'' biased towards the Doctor and his allies. Aren't we supposed to present an unbiased view of the DWU?
Now. Let's see who in that whole list actually has the traitor category applied: of course, Daxtar and Chen. This is ''extremely'' biased towards the Doctor and his allies. Aren't we supposed to present an unbiased view of the DWU?


Let me quote a passage from [[T:CAT NAMES]]: "''Above all else, category names must not be open to multiple interpretation, and must be free of any bias or value judgements.''"<br />--[[user:SmallerOnTheOutside|SOTO]] [[User talk:SmallerOnTheOutside|☎]] 04:48, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
Let me quote a passage from [[T:CAT NAMES]]: "''Above all else, category names must not be open to multiple interpretation, and must be free of any bias or value judgements.''"<br />--[[user:SmallerOnTheOutside|SOTO]] [[User talk:SmallerOnTheOutside|☎]] 04:48, July 30, 2013 (UTC)


:Proposed deletion tag added. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:09, July 25, 2017 (UTC)
:Proposed deletion tag added. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:09, July 25, 2017 (UTC)
The category has been deleted. Really, [[User:SOTO]]'s post says it all, but for those who are interested, there was a similar case several years ago where we got rid of "enemy" and "ally" categories. That discussion can be found at [[Forum:What makes an ally and an enemy?]] [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:27, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:14, 19 February 2019

A lil' bit too biased?[[edit]]

Surely "traitor" is a little too subjective for a category — one side's traitor is another's hero. I mean, just take a look at The Daleks' Master Plan. Here's a list of all the people that were called traitor in that serial (the ones that I caught, anyway):

Practically the entire cast is at some point named a traitor by the opposing side!

Now. Let's see who in that whole list actually has the traitor category applied: of course, Daxtar and Chen. This is extremely biased towards the Doctor and his allies. Aren't we supposed to present an unbiased view of the DWU?

Let me quote a passage from T:CAT NAMES: "Above all else, category names must not be open to multiple interpretation, and must be free of any bias or value judgements."
--SOTO 04:48, July 30, 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion tag added. Shambala108 02:09, July 25, 2017 (UTC)

The category has been deleted. Really, User:SOTO's post says it all, but for those who are interested, there was a similar case several years ago where we got rid of "enemy" and "ally" categories. That discussion can be found at Forum:What makes an ally and an enemy? Shambala108 00:27, June 6, 2018 (UTC)