Talk:Series 11 (Doctor Who 2005): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (Reverted edits by Brian Boy (talk) to last version by GusF)
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div id=box>
{{ArchCat}}
Please note that, per [[Tardis:Spoiler policy]], spoilers may not be posted on this talk page. Spoilers are only allowed on the Series 11 page itself.
</div>
== Peculiar edits ==
I'm not sure if this is the place I should be writing - but I suggest locking this page and only allowing registered users to edit it. I keep coming across peculiar edits by those without accounts and I don't get why. [[User:StevieGLiverpool|StevieGLiverpool]] [[User talk:StevieGLiverpool|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:27, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
:No. What they need to do is exile all these different accounts clearly used by the exact same person. They usually have a long weird code for a username. I tried to tell the person off, but I was told to do something real complicated. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:01, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
::The page has been protected. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:25, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
::: Just to clarify one thing. I strongly suspect that the "long weird code" you mention is just their IP address in the recently rolled out {{w|IPv6}} format. Thus, attempts to contact such a person may well be futile as they do not receive notifications. This can also explain the changes in the observed user descriptions: these are different IP addresses rather than multiple accounts. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:16, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
::::Yeah, that's what I thought, so there should be no more accusations from users that any of these anonymous users are the same one. That's up to the admins to decide. Thanks, [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:23, November 14, 2017 (UTC)


== April Fool's ==
== Zany CGI World ==


What do we do about April Fool's jokes surrounding the new series? I've come across two already. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 11:24, April 1, 2018 (UTC)
I could have sworn originally the episode with the "CGI action sequence" was listed as ''Kerblam'', but now it says ''The Tsurunga Conundrum''. Both are Perrott episodes, but I think the sequence in question is when Ryan, Yaz and Charlie are riding the conveyor belts to get to the basement levels. Fits in with the complete green scene and fans. That would be a nightmare to build a practical set for, whereas most of ''Tsurunga'' is just set on the ambulance craft.
:I would stick them in the Rumours section but explicitly state it was an April Fool. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:27, April 1, 2018 (UTC)
::If they're April Fools jokes, then they're not even rumors, so why put them on the page? [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:49, April 1, 2018 (UTC)
::: I agree with Shambala108, April Fools jokes shouldn’t be put on articles. Unless it is central to a plot line, but then it’s not a real April Fools joke. [[User:TheTARDISLegilimens|TheTARDISLegilimens]] [[User talk:TheTARDISLegilimens|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:44, April 1, 2018 (UTC)


:::: I concur with Shambala108 and TheTARDISLegilimens. [[User:GusF|GusF]] [[User talk:GusF|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:57, April 1, 2018 (UTC)
Is there any evidence to suggest this was, in fact, ''Tsurunga''? [[User:Guyus24|Guyus24]] [[User talk:Guyus24|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 08:15, January 13, 2019 (UTC)
:I thought it might be the junkyard planet in ''Tsuranga''. After all, I remember them describing it as a whole ''world'' that's just CGI.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 12:02, January 13, 2019 (UTC)
::"I did have a zany action sequence in studio where we just had the actors, green screen and fans blowing their hair – the entire world around them will be created with VFX." That does sound more like the conveyer belt scene in ''Kerblam!''.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 12:10, January 13, 2019 (UTC)
 
:::Junkyard looks like a [http://cultbox.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/brightened.jpg practical set] to me. But now the question is, seeing as it's not really a 'whole world' but one just specific FX shot that happened to be per-announced, is it really worth a mention? [[User:Guyus24|Guyus24]] [[User talk:Guyus24|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 06:08, January 14, 2019 (UTC)
::::More worth mentioning on the story page than here, unless this is literally the first time the ''Doctor Who'' production team has done a scene with no practical sets at all.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 06:19, January 14, 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:38, 20 April 2024

Archive.png
 Archives: #1

Zany CGI World[[edit source]]

I could have sworn originally the episode with the "CGI action sequence" was listed as Kerblam, but now it says The Tsurunga Conundrum. Both are Perrott episodes, but I think the sequence in question is when Ryan, Yaz and Charlie are riding the conveyor belts to get to the basement levels. Fits in with the complete green scene and fans. That would be a nightmare to build a practical set for, whereas most of Tsurunga is just set on the ambulance craft.

Is there any evidence to suggest this was, in fact, Tsurunga? Guyus24 ☎ 08:15, January 13, 2019 (UTC)

I thought it might be the junkyard planet in Tsuranga. After all, I remember them describing it as a whole world that's just CGI.
×   SOTO contribs ×°/↯/•]   💬•| {/-//:   12:02, January 13, 2019 (UTC)
"I did have a zany action sequence in studio where we just had the actors, green screen and fans blowing their hair – the entire world around them will be created with VFX." That does sound more like the conveyer belt scene in Kerblam!.
×   SOTO contribs ×°/↯/•]   💬•| {/-//:   12:10, January 13, 2019 (UTC)
Junkyard looks like a practical set to me. But now the question is, seeing as it's not really a 'whole world' but one just specific FX shot that happened to be per-announced, is it really worth a mention? Guyus24 ☎ 06:08, January 14, 2019 (UTC)
More worth mentioning on the story page than here, unless this is literally the first time the Doctor Who production team has done a scene with no practical sets at all.
×   SOTO contribs ×°/↯/•]   💬•| {/-//:   06:19, January 14, 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Series_11_(Doctor_Who_2005)&oldid=3774777"