User talk:Berkay1765: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
 
Line 32: Line 32:


'''[[User:TheDarkBomber|<span style="color:springgreen">TheDarkBomber</span>]]''' -- ''[[User_talk:TheDarkBomber|<span style="color:forestgreen">Talk Page</span>]]'' 14:46, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
'''[[User:TheDarkBomber|<span style="color:springgreen">TheDarkBomber</span>]]''' -- ''[[User_talk:TheDarkBomber|<span style="color:forestgreen">Talk Page</span>]]'' 14:46, April 6, 2020 (UTC)
: Great points raised by User:TheDarkBomber. But as an admin, I must point that you also violated two very important policies, namely: [[Tardis:Vandalism policy]] was violated in [https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/The_Doctor%27s_species?diff=prev&oldid=2871905 this edit] and [[Tardis:No personal attacks]] was violated ''twice'' in [https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Chris_Chibnall?diff=prev&oldid=2871902 this and the following edit]. Usually, these violations could be enough to be seen as an infinite ban, but I'll [[Help:Assume good faith|assume good faith]] that there was some good intention in some of your edits and only give you a week ban, so that you can:
* get acquainted with the aforementioned policies
* get a better grasp at how things are [[Tardis:Discussion policy|discussed on this wiki]]
Once you ban is lifted, you're welcome back to discuss these edits, but I'll reinforce that violations of [[Tardis:Vandalism policy]] and [[Tardis:No personal attacks]] are usually 100% not tolerated, and breaking them again will most likely lead to a permanent block by an admin. [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] ([[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|talk]]) 16:09, April 6, 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:09, 6 April 2020

Welcome to the Tardis:About Berkay1765

Thanks for your edits! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is a great time to have joined us, because now you can play the Game of Rassilon with us and win cool stuff! Well, okay, badges. That have no monetary value. And that largely only you can see. But still: they're cool!

We've got a couple of important quirks for a Wikia wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.
British English, please
We generally use British English round these parts, so if you're American, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:

If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! —  you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:
~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my talk page. SOTO 11:23, April 6, 2020 (UTC)

Concerns about your contributions regarding The Doctor's species[[edit source]]

It seems that you insist on considering The Doctor's species as being a Time Lord, when the general consensus appears to be to label the Doctor as being The Doctor's species due to uncertainty about whether the Doctor is partially human (TV: Doctor Who, PROSE: Doctor Who and the Daleks, et al), a Time Lord (TV: The War Games, et al), or the Timeless Child's species (TV: The Timeless Children).

If you wish to offer your own opinion, please use the talk page on a relevant article, such as Talk:The Doctor or Talk:The Doctor's species, or open a thread on the forums, in accordance with Tardis:Edit wars are good for absolutely nothing.

TheDarkBomber -- Talk Page 14:46, April 6, 2020 (UTC)

Great points raised by User:TheDarkBomber. But as an admin, I must point that you also violated two very important policies, namely: Tardis:Vandalism policy was violated in this edit and Tardis:No personal attacks was violated twice in this and the following edit. Usually, these violations could be enough to be seen as an infinite ban, but I'll assume good faith that there was some good intention in some of your edits and only give you a week ban, so that you can:

Once you ban is lifted, you're welcome back to discuss these edits, but I'll reinforce that violations of Tardis:Vandalism policy and Tardis:No personal attacks are usually 100% not tolerated, and breaking them again will most likely lead to a permanent block by an admin. OncomingStorm12th (talk) 16:09, April 6, 2020 (UTC)