Talk:Doctor Who: Lockdown!: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
(198 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Rename reason==
{{ArchCat}}
Name changed as stated by creator [https://twitter.com/Emily_Rosina/status/1244162833933352960 here] [[User:Toqgers|Toqgers]] [[User talk:Toqgers|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 08:07, March 29, 2020 (UTC)


== missing number  ==
== Are the things covered in the last few archives now fine for inclusion? ==


There is a Watchalong number 8 and number 10, but where is number 9? --[[User:Rübenbrei|Rübenbrei]] [[User talk:Rübenbrei|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:46, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
I am asking because the story has gotten continued, the Rule 2 exceptions and the case to be made for charity publications that had permission from the licence-holders (even though as argued they aren't technically using a commercial licence.)
:I think that someone thought Human Nature / Family of Blood were to be counted seperately. [[User:Xx-connor-xX|Xx-connor-xX]] [[User talk:Xx-connor-xX|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:52, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
not signed in, 8th Jan 2024
 
== Paternoster Gang ==
Is the Paternoster Gang watch-along really part of this event? It had nothing to do with Emily Cook or the Lockdown! brand. It was organised solely by Big Finish. [[User:Xx-connor-xX|Xx-connor-xX]] [[User talk:Xx-connor-xX|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:52, May 5, 2020 (UTC)
 
== Other Watchalongs ==
If we are to keep track of ALL tweetalong events during COVID-19 pandemics, I think these events should be added:
* ''[[Spyfall (TV story)|Spyfall]]'' watchalong hosted by [[BBC America]]. Although it didn't use hashtag, [[Sacha Dhawan]] joined the watchalong and tweeted his comments.
* Two [[Torchwood (TV series)|Torchwood]] watchalongs hosted by [[Radio Times]].
* Upcoming [[The Three Doctors (TV story)|The Three Doctors]] watchalong hosted by TardisMonkey (who arranged [[The Five Doctors (TV story)|The Five Doctors]] watchalong)
But is it really necessary? I mean, anyone can start a tweetalong event. If I arrange a tweetalong event, should it be covered by this article? I think we need some criteria for this article's coverage.--[[User:Wholmesian|Wholmesian]] [[User talk:Wholmesian|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 05:44, May 6, 2020 (UTC)
:I removed the Paternoser Gang watch-along because frankly it has nothing to do with this event, but someone else added it to a newly created “other” section. I agree that a I don’t think these should be covered, anyone can host a watch-along but none of these are part of the same event. [[User:Xx-connor-xX|Xx-connor-xX]] [[User talk:Xx-connor-xX|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:32, May 6, 2020 (UTC)
That does seem a bit of a shame to remove The Five Doctors and the Big Finish ones, I agree that not every watch-along should be posted, but maybe keep it to anything endorsed or organised by Emily Cook or the BBC? I think that's a fair way of doing it if the "other" section is reinstated. [[User:VeryFerociousDrama|VeryFerociousDrama]] [[User talk:VeryFerociousDrama|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:35, May 7, 2020 (UTC)
::I think it's clear that any and all post-''Lockdown'', COVID-19-era ''Doctor Who'' tweetalongs are inspired by ''Lockdown!''. For that reason, so long as the deleted [[COVID-19]] page remains deleted, I think this is the best page to document all the ‘official’ watchalongs. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:50, May 7, 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:33, 8 January 2024

Archive.png
Archives: #1

Are the things covered in the last few archives now fine for inclusion?[[edit source]]

I am asking because the story has gotten continued, the Rule 2 exceptions and the case to be made for charity publications that had permission from the licence-holders (even though as argued they aren't technically using a commercial licence.)

not signed in, 8th Jan 2024