Talk:Shakedown (novelisation): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (OncomingStorm12th moved page Talk:Shakedown (novel) to Talk:Shakedown (novelisation)) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Bumping this again 92 months later. I see no reason for this page not to be dabbed novelisation, like all others. I imagine this was just an oversight somewhere along the line.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 03:19, September 4, 2020 (UTC) | ::Bumping this again 92 months later. I see no reason for this page not to be dabbed novelisation, like all others. I imagine this was just an oversight somewhere along the line.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 03:19, September 4, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::Ah, [[User:SOTO|SOTO]], you beat me to it. But I concur. [[User:Epsilon the Eternal|Epsilon the Eternal]] [[User talk:Epsilon the Eternal|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:20, September 4, 2020 (UTC) | :::Ah, [[User:SOTO|SOTO]], you beat me to it. But I concur. [[User:Epsilon the Eternal|Epsilon the Eternal]] [[User talk:Epsilon the Eternal|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:20, September 4, 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::[[Downtime (novelisation)]] is ample precedent. Though I really feel that with talk page discussions like this, [[Talk:Lolita]], and [[Talk:Sleepy (novel)]] it might behoove someone to go through and find all talk page discussions that have petered out over the years. Just. Wow that would be a task better suited for a bot. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:59, September 4, 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::::Alright, almost ten years later... case closed, as pointed out, there's more than enough precedent for this to be dabbed as a (novelisation). [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] [[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:45, 2 March 2022
Novel or novelisation?[[edit source]]
Is there a reason this page is titled Shakedown (novel) instead of Shakedown (novelisation)? Was it a deliberate decision, since a large part of the book is original material rather than an adaptation of the video, or was it just a glitch? —Josiah Rowe talk to me 22:57, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Eight months later, and nobody's answered this... —Josiah Rowe ☎ 07:23, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Bumping this again 92 months later. I see no reason for this page not to be dabbed novelisation, like all others. I imagine this was just an oversight somewhere along the line.
× SOTO (☎/✍/↯) 03:19, September 4, 2020 (UTC)- Ah, SOTO, you beat me to it. But I concur. Epsilon the Eternal ☎ 03:20, September 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Downtime (novelisation) is ample precedent. Though I really feel that with talk page discussions like this, Talk:Lolita, and Talk:Sleepy (novel) it might behoove someone to go through and find all talk page discussions that have petered out over the years. Just. Wow that would be a task better suited for a bot. Najawin ☎ 03:59, September 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Alright, almost ten years later... case closed, as pointed out, there's more than enough precedent for this to be dabbed as a (novelisation). OncomingStorm12th ☎ 21:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Downtime (novelisation) is ample precedent. Though I really feel that with talk page discussions like this, Talk:Lolita, and Talk:Sleepy (novel) it might behoove someone to go through and find all talk page discussions that have petered out over the years. Just. Wow that would be a task better suited for a bot. Najawin ☎ 03:59, September 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, SOTO, you beat me to it. But I concur. Epsilon the Eternal ☎ 03:20, September 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Bumping this again 92 months later. I see no reason for this page not to be dabbed novelisation, like all others. I imagine this was just an oversight somewhere along the line.
