Truth or Consequences (short story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Borisashton (talk | contribs) (Oops. Undo revision 3022285 by Borisashton (talk)) |
m (Updating links from Series 9 (Doctor Who) to Series 9 (Doctor Who 2005)) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{title dab away}} | {{title dab away}} | ||
{{real world}} | |||
{{invalid}} | {{invalid}} | ||
{{ | {{ImageLinkShortStory}} | ||
{{Infobox Story | {{Infobox Story SMW | ||
|image = TOC.JPG | |image = TOC.JPG | ||
|doctor = | |doctor = Missed call Doctor{{!}}The Doctor | ||
|featuring = [[One-eyed reader]] | |featuring = [[One-eyed reader]] | ||
|setting = | |setting = | ||
|lead writer = Steven Moffat | |lead writer = Steven Moffat | ||
|other writers = [[Catherine Tregenna]], [[Mark Gatiss]], [[Sarah Dollard]], [[Peter Harness]], [[Toby Whithouse]] and [[Jamie Mathieson]] | |other writers = Catherine Tregenna, Mark Gatiss, Sarah Dollard, Peter Harness, Toby Whithouse, Jamie Mathieson | ||
|other contributors = [[Catherine Tregenna]], [[Mark Gatiss]], [[Sarah Dollard]], [[Peter Harness]], [[Toby Whithouse]] and [[Jamie Mathieson]]<!--display override--> | |||
|read by = Moffat, Tregenna, Gatiss, Dollard, Harness, Whithouse and Mathieson | |read by = Moffat, Tregenna, Gatiss, Dollard, Harness, Whithouse and Mathieson | ||
|platform = [[Facebook]], [[YouTube]] | |platform = [[Facebook]], [[YouTube]] | ||
|release date = | |format = Online short story | ||
|release date = 13 January 2016 | |||
|fullvid = Creating A Story With Series 9 Writers - Doctor Who | |fullvid = Creating A Story With Series 9 Writers - Doctor Who | ||
}}{{dab page|Truth or Consequences}} | }}{{dab page|Truth or Consequences}} | ||
{{big toc}} | {{big toc}} | ||
On [[13 January (releases)|13 January]] [[2016 (releases)|2016]], the [[Doctor Who]] [[Facebook]] page released a video where "the writing team of [[Series 9 (Doctor Who)|Series 9]] play a game of '''''Truth or Consequences'''''." It was subsequently released to [[YouTube]], as well. | On [[13 January (releases)|13 January]] [[2016 (releases)|2016]], the [[Doctor Who]] [[Facebook]] page released a video where "the writing team of [[Series 9 (Doctor Who 2005)|Series 9]] play a game of '''''Truth or Consequences'''''." It was subsequently released to [[YouTube]], as well. | ||
Aside from "lead writer" [[Steven Moffat]], each [[writer]] contributed one passage to the narrative, with only the ''previous'' passage for reference. In other words, [[Mark Gatiss]] had no idea what anybody had written prior to [[Catherine Tregenna]]'s segment, and so on. Steven Moffat both opened and closed the story, and thus was the only writer to have contributed two distinct passages to this exercise. | Aside from "lead writer" [[Steven Moffat]], each [[writer]] contributed one passage to the narrative, with only the ''previous'' passage for reference. In other words, [[Mark Gatiss]] had no idea what anybody had written prior to [[Catherine Tregenna]]'s segment, and so on. Steven Moffat both opened and closed the story, and thus was the only writer to have contributed two distinct passages to this exercise. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 25: | ||
== Synopsis == | == Synopsis == | ||
A [[phone]] call brings [[The Doctor | A [[phone]] call brings [[The Doctor/Non-valid sources#The Missed call Doctor|the Doctor]] to an unusual [[restaurant]]... | ||
== Text == | == Text == | ||
| Line 32: | Line 35: | ||
=== Mark Gatiss (3) === | === Mark Gatiss (3) === | ||
:And the TARDIS listened. Listened so hard that [[ | :And the TARDIS listened. Listened so hard that [[The Doctor/Non-valid sources#The Missed call Doctor|the Doctor]] could hear it thinking, deciding between [[hope]] and [[glory]], [[nirvana]] or [[oblivion]]. "We've arrived." | ||
=== Sarah Dollard (4) === | === Sarah Dollard (4) === | ||
| Line 51: | Line 54: | ||
== Characters == | == Characters == | ||
* [[One-eyed reader]] | * [[One-eyed reader]] | ||
* [[The Doctor | * [[The Doctor/Non-valid sources#The Missed call Doctor|The Doctor]] | ||
== | == Worldbuilding == | ||
''to be added'' | ''to be added'' | ||
| Line 59: | Line 62: | ||
* Due to the inherently ridiculous nature of the story's construction, it is riddled with inconsistencies; the piece switches from third-person to first-person narrative partway through, and the role of protagonist seems to switch, without explanation, from the Doctor to an unidentified individual who refers to the Doctor as a separate entity — though this is mirrored by many passages of first-person narration by incarnations of the Doctor in Moffat's own [[The Day of the Doctor (novelisation)|novelisation of ''The Day of the Doctor'']], with the various Doctors speaking about "the Doctor" in the third person as the person they would like to be and "play-act" as. | * Due to the inherently ridiculous nature of the story's construction, it is riddled with inconsistencies; the piece switches from third-person to first-person narrative partway through, and the role of protagonist seems to switch, without explanation, from the Doctor to an unidentified individual who refers to the Doctor as a separate entity — though this is mirrored by many passages of first-person narration by incarnations of the Doctor in Moffat's own [[The Day of the Doctor (novelisation)|novelisation of ''The Day of the Doctor'']], with the various Doctors speaking about "the Doctor" in the third person as the person they would like to be and "play-act" as. | ||
* Before beginning to read, [[Steven Moffat]] says of the story as written, ''"This is a weird story; this is really quite disgusting."'' | * Before beginning to read, [[Steven Moffat]] says of the story as written, ''"This is a weird story; this is really quite disgusting."'' | ||
* He also states that "this is the world's shortest ''Doctor Who'' story", though this is not in fact the case. The very short story ''[[Vrs (short story)|Vrs]]'', from ''[[Short Trips and Side Steps]]'', includes only 17 words, in one sentence, with all vowels removed. This piece totals 237 words. | * He also states that "this is the world's shortest ''Doctor Who'' story", though this is not in fact the case. The very short story ''[[Vrs (short story)|Vrs]]'', from ''[[Short Trips and Side Steps]]'', includes only 17 words, in one sentence, with all vowels removed. The second shortest story, an [[Untitled (The Panda Book of Horror short story)|untitled piece]] from ''[[The Panda Book of Horror (anthology)|The Panda Book of Horror]]'', comprised of 20 words. This piece totals 237 words. | ||
* The opening line bears a strong resemblance to a microfiction piece published by Moffat on [[Twitter]] in 2012: ''"The [[worm]] became an idea, which hid itself in words, until it could climb, devouring all, through the eye of the reader of this tweet."''<ref name="tweet">http://www.bsfa.co.uk/bsfa-awards/bsfa-tweetfiction-tweetstream-eastercon-2012-winners/</ref> | * The opening line bears a strong resemblance to a microfiction piece published by Moffat on [[Twitter]] in 2012: ''"The [[worm]] became an idea, which hid itself in words, until it could climb, devouring all, through the eye of the reader of this tweet."''<ref name="tweet">http://www.bsfa.co.uk/bsfa-awards/bsfa-tweetfiction-tweetstream-eastercon-2012-winners/</ref> | ||
=== Ratings === | === Ratings === | ||
* [[Facebook]]: 29k views / 1.1k likes | * [[Facebook]]: 29k views / 1.1k likes | ||
* [[YouTube]]: | * [[YouTube]]: 51.7k views / 1.3k likes ({{as of|2023|3|lc=y}}) | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
| Line 74: | Line 77: | ||
[[Category:Non-DWU short stories]] | [[Category:Non-DWU short stories]] | ||
[[Category:2016 short stories]] | [[Category:2016 short stories]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Web-based Doctor Who short stories]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:18, 25 April 2024
- You may wish to consult
Truth or Consequencesfor other, similarly-named pages.
On 13 January 2016, the Doctor Who Facebook page released a video where "the writing team of Series 9 play a game of Truth or Consequences." It was subsequently released to YouTube, as well.
Aside from "lead writer" Steven Moffat, each writer contributed one passage to the narrative, with only the previous passage for reference. In other words, Mark Gatiss had no idea what anybody had written prior to Catherine Tregenna's segment, and so on. Steven Moffat both opened and closed the story, and thus was the only writer to have contributed two distinct passages to this exercise.
At the end of the video, viewers are encouraged to carry on the story in the comments, with the words "Over To You", leading to many fan-made continuations.
Synopsis[[edit] | [edit source]]
A phone call brings the Doctor to an unusual restaurant...
Text[[edit] | [edit source]]
Steven Moffat (1)[[edit] | [edit source]]
- The creature disguised as words fired its deadly ray at the unsuspecting reader out of this full stop.
Catherine Tregenna (2)[[edit] | [edit source]]
- The one-eyed reader, hellbent on revenge, knew it was time to call the TARDIS. Words ran out in the darkness.
Mark Gatiss (3)[[edit] | [edit source]]
- And the TARDIS listened. Listened so hard that the Doctor could hear it thinking, deciding between hope and glory, nirvana or oblivion. "We've arrived."
Sarah Dollard (4)[[edit] | [edit source]]
- The moment the Doctor put his hand to the door it was caught by a gust of wind, and blew back in on him, bringing with it the stench of death.
Peter Harness (5)[[edit] | [edit source]]
- In the room beyond, a table was set for dinner: candles, cut glass, and decayed dusty food, mouldy and rotten. The Doctor sat himself down at the head of the table, and called expectantly into the darkness.
Toby Whithouse (6)[[edit] | [edit source]]
- "Hello! Can I speak to the manager? I want to make a complaint." Silence stretched in the air. Then came a shuffling of feet as the waiter appeared. Or at least, his clothes did. There was no body inside them, just a shell of cloth hanging about an empty fame of air.
Jamie Mathieson (7)[[edit] | [edit source]]
- Determined not to be fazed, I made my complaint. The ghost waiter clicked his heels and left. I then realised that the skin on my soup had a belly button.
Steven Moffat (8)[[edit] | [edit source]]
- I thought for a moment what the Doctor would do in this situation, and then realised something: the belly button was mine. I ate it.
Characters[[edit] | [edit source]]
Worldbuilding[[edit] | [edit source]]
to be added
Story notes[[edit] | [edit source]]
- Due to the inherently ridiculous nature of the story's construction, it is riddled with inconsistencies; the piece switches from third-person to first-person narrative partway through, and the role of protagonist seems to switch, without explanation, from the Doctor to an unidentified individual who refers to the Doctor as a separate entity — though this is mirrored by many passages of first-person narration by incarnations of the Doctor in Moffat's own novelisation of The Day of the Doctor, with the various Doctors speaking about "the Doctor" in the third person as the person they would like to be and "play-act" as.
- Before beginning to read, Steven Moffat says of the story as written, "This is a weird story; this is really quite disgusting."
- He also states that "this is the world's shortest Doctor Who story", though this is not in fact the case. The very short story Vrs, from Short Trips and Side Steps, includes only 17 words, in one sentence, with all vowels removed. The second shortest story, an untitled piece from The Panda Book of Horror, comprised of 20 words. This piece totals 237 words.
- The opening line bears a strong resemblance to a microfiction piece published by Moffat on Twitter in 2012: "The worm became an idea, which hid itself in words, until it could climb, devouring all, through the eye of the reader of this tweet."[1]
