|
|
| (19 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Welcome|[[User:Delton Menace]]|''--[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 05:06, November 22, 2009 (UTC)''}} | | {{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}14:33: Tue 20 Dec 2011 </span> |
| | | {{Christmas greetings}} |
| ==Saxon 3==
| |
| Hi. Unless the user is doing something specifically against our [[Tardis:Vandalism policy]], or being abusive towards users (see [[Tardis:What the TARDIS Index File is not#What the TARDIS Index File Doctor Who Wiki community is not]]) there isn't much in the way of our policy that I can do anything. The user has been warned not to deleted other's posts or talk pages. Please feel free to inform me should any of this escalate into what I've described. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 07:55, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| ==User page==
| |
| IP user has been blocked for 6 months. I can also delete your user page (so it goes back to not existing) if you want. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:10, December 25, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Large spacing ==
| |
| | |
| Please do not large amounts of spacing to articles. Thank You. [[User:Bigshowbower|Bigshowbower]] 11:18, December 27, 2009 (UTC) | |
| | |
| I may have gotten the wrong end of the stick Im sorry, but either way if you do see the large spacing please remove it instead of leaving. If you have problems inform an admin. --[[User:Bigshowbower|Bigshowbower]] 12:23, December 27, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :I've noticed that the new default "magic" editor likes to introduce large spacing all over the place. I've set my default to the standard editor and never have the issues with extra spacing. Just fyi. -- [[User:Sulfur|sulfur]] 15:20, December 27, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| How do you change it, exactly? [[User:Delton Menace|Delton Menace]] 16:25, December 27, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :Sorry, I missed that you'd asked this along the way. I'm guessing (from the random spacing you're still introducing) that you're still using the rich text editor?
| |
| :If so, I would ''strongly'' recommend going to the "more" option in the upper right, choosing preferences, scroll down to "editing preferences", and turn '''off''' the "rich text editing". It does a lot of really poor formatting things to articles and makes a multitude of changes that should not be made. -- [[User:Sulfur|sulfur]] 22:27, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == thanks ==
| |
| | |
| Thanks for agreeing with me on [[Forum:Children of Earth]]. It sucks how all the admins and greatly respected users are against it, though. Still, thanks. I'm A Hydroponic Tomato! [[User:Bigredrabbit|Bigredrabbit]] 23:30, December 27, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| hi--[[User:The mysterious|The mysterious]] 15:59, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Lucy Saxon==
| |
| However we're applying our own POV to things by stating absolutely that she is dead. Commentaries mean nothing, as it's what happens on screen that counts (they can be acknowledged, of course, in out-of-universe real world content). To give an example, someone could write that Harry Sullivan is dead, based on the fact Ian Marter is dead and that the first episode of Sarah Jane Adventures includes a line of dialogue that strongly suggests Harry is no longer alive. But unless they out and say it, we can't say with 100% certainty for any character. Alternately, [[Geoff Noble]] is definitely dead, because this has now been referenced directly in Partners in Crime and indirectly in the End of Time finale. If Moffat decides to write a future story with the Master (who likewise cannot be said to have died) and Lucy, there is nothing on screen that would prevent him from doing so. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 18:50, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Spacing on articles==
| |
| You're still adding a ton of blank spacing to articles when you edit them. Are you still using the "fancy" editor?
| |
| | |
| If so, I would ''strongly'' recommend going to the "more" option in the upper right, choosing preferences, scroll down to "editing preferences", and turn '''off''' the "rich text editing". It does a lot of really poor formatting things to articles and makes a multitude of changes that should not be made. -- [[User:Sulfur|sulfur]] 16:50, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Series 5 Discontinuity ==
| |
| | |
| The thing is it should not be in ''The End of Time'', the suit you have seen is from the trailer for Series 5 and or set photo it has no place on the ''The End of Time'' page. When the first episode of Series 5 airs, which shows the suit and it being ripped you can then raise that issue. --[[User:Bigshowbower|Bigshowbower]] 12:07, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == The End of Time ==
| |
| | |
| Is it me or is The End of Time discontinuity section getting out of hand, I had to remove a few things regarding Rassilon and his immortality. I would appreciate if you can watch out for that section as well.
| |
| | |
| :I think I might removed anything regarding Rassilon's immortality and as you said bring the two Time Lords to Earth as well. I think its descended into just plain and annoying nitpicking. --[[User:Bigshowbower|Bigshowbower]] 03:57, January 11, 2010 (UTC) | |
| | |
| Oh, here we go again! The stupid questions return! That question regarding the two Weeping Time Lords going to Earth was wrote down again, and the answer removed (again), a stupid question of why the Master counted how many times he hit Rassilion (does it really matter?), which was ''four'' counts (you'd think they would have guessed by now), why the Master had power (answered a billion times in the story, to do with his life force), and why the Vinvoochi left the Gate behind (they clearly said they were leaving Earth before it got "knocked out of orbit").
| |
| | |
| Why do people ask such stupid questions that have little meaning, and are answered in the episode itself? Well, it is either questions clearly answered in the episode, or questions that have nothing to do with discontinuity and have little meaning. *sigh* Of course, I cleared the pointless questions out, they were flooding the discontinuity section and had no meaning. [[User:Delton Menace|Delton Menace]] 23:55, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Re:Partners in Crime placement ==
| |
| | |
| Yeah, its because some stupid line in The Fires of Pompeii states that Partners in Crime is in 2008. This is a hot topic of fan debate, but it is easy just to put PiC in 2008 and The Sontaran Stratagem and Journey's End in 2009. I'm A Hydroponic Tomato! [[User:Bigredrabbit|Bigredrabbit]] ('''[[User talk:Bigredrabbit|talk to me]]''') 05:02, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
| |
