Talk:Village of the Angels (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
mNo edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Why on Earth is Angel Bob listed as the main villain of that episode? He was just the only one named. [[User:RadMatter|RadMatter]] [[User talk:RadMatter|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC) | : Why on Earth is Angel Bob listed as the main villain of that episode? He was just the only one named. [[User:RadMatter|RadMatter]] [[User talk:RadMatter|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
::There's a lot of misuse of the villain field of infoboxes. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC) | ::There's a lot of misuse of the villain field of infoboxes. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
:::Is there any documentation on how that field should be used? I agree that that sounds like misuse, but I've often wondered about that field on some more debatable stories. Honestly, this episode could be one of those; while the Extraction Squad seem like the clear villains for most of the story, it's revealed at the end that the only other Weeping Angel in the episode set the Doctor up as a patsy, which seems just as villainous to me. My instinct is that the field should be left as-is.[[User:Schreibenheimer|Schreibenheimer]] [[User talk:Schreibenheimer|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC) | :::Is there any documentation on how that field should be used? I agree that that sounds like misuse, but I've often wondered about that field on some more debatable stories. Honestly, this episode could be one of those; while the Extraction Squad seem like the clear villains for most of the story, it's revealed at the end that the only other Weeping Angel in the episode set the Doctor up as a patsy, which seems just as villainous to me. My instinct is that the field should be left as-is. [[User:Schreibenheimer|Schreibenheimer]] [[User talk:Schreibenheimer|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:20, 22 November 2021
Should the 'villain' space be more specific? like how The S5 2-parter currently has the villain listed as Angel Bob, should a page be made for "Angel Extraction Squad", and have that here, since these are specific angels with their own agenda?
- Why on Earth is Angel Bob listed as the main villain of that episode? He was just the only one named. RadMatter ☎ 21:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- There's a lot of misuse of the villain field of infoboxes. Shambala108 ☎ 02:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Is there any documentation on how that field should be used? I agree that that sounds like misuse, but I've often wondered about that field on some more debatable stories. Honestly, this episode could be one of those; while the Extraction Squad seem like the clear villains for most of the story, it's revealed at the end that the only other Weeping Angel in the episode set the Doctor up as a patsy, which seems just as villainous to me. My instinct is that the field should be left as-is. Schreibenheimer ☎ 03:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- There's a lot of misuse of the villain field of infoboxes. Shambala108 ☎ 02:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)