Talk:BFP 1: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (→Rename) |
(→Rename) Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: If we do go the more traditional route, I'd strongly recommend leaving redirects for the more BF website-compatible numbering. These could be created en masse by bot. Any thoughts from the community?{{User:SOTO/sig}} 09:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC) | : If we do go the more traditional route, I'd strongly recommend leaving redirects for the more BF website-compatible numbering. These could be created en masse by bot. Any thoughts from the community?{{User:SOTO/sig}} 09:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: Yeah that could work - both are fine, but I think I prefer the latter. I don't think a table would be useful though, as the shear volume of podcasts, and the number of missing podcasts, makes it impractical to represent them all on a single page, hence the existence of [[The Big Finish Podcast/2008]]. The act of working out the numbering would be difficult and probably quite error-prone... not to mention the episodes which were simply early releases of the first parts of Main Range stories. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:22, 27 February 2023
Rename[[edit source]]
So, I created this page in what I thought was the vein of BFP 1908 and BFP 1909. The problem is, I've since worked out that BFP 1908 is not the 1908th podcast, it's the 8th podcast of 2019. The numbers 1908 and 1909 come from the podcast listing on the Big Finish website, but obviously BFP 1 doesn't have such a listing. If we were to go with the format used on the website, this podcast should instead be renamed to BFP 0801, and I think consistency with these things is important. Alternatively we could work out what the real numbers of BFP 1908 and 1909 are and rename them to that. Does anybody have any thoughts on the matter? Danochy ☎ 11:42, November 22, 2020 (UTC)
- I'd be in favour of either BFP08 1 (eh), something like BFP 08-01 (to show that this isn't really an ordinary case of T:MAGS), or, indeed, getting a table together and numbering them more traditionally.
- If we do go the more traditional route, I'd strongly recommend leaving redirects for the more BF website-compatible numbering. These could be created en masse by bot. Any thoughts from the community?
× SOTO (☎/✍/↯) 09:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah that could work - both are fine, but I think I prefer the latter. I don't think a table would be useful though, as the shear volume of podcasts, and the number of missing podcasts, makes it impractical to represent them all on a single page, hence the existence of The Big Finish Podcast/2008. The act of working out the numbering would be difficult and probably quite error-prone... not to mention the episodes which were simply early releases of the first parts of Main Range stories. Danochy ☎ 00:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
