Template talk:For: Difference between revisions
NateBumber (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Hatnote == Epsilon and TheGreatGabester have identified that the design of our {{tlx|dab page}}, {{tlx|you may}}, and {{tlx|for}} templates is causing severe formatting issues on many of our pages (Whoisdoctorwho.co.uk chief among them). This problem could be very simply resolved by following our evil twin: as one can see at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Who, Wikipedia uses {{w|Wikipedia:Hatnote|hatnote...") |
PintlessMan (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary Tag: visualeditor-wikitext |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Hatnote == | == Hatnote == | ||
[[User:Epsilon the Eternal|Epsilon]] and [[User:TheGreatGabester|TheGreatGabester]] have identified that the design of our {{tlx|dab page}}, {{tlx|you may}}, and {{tlx|for}} templates is causing severe formatting issues on many of our pages ([[Whoisdoctorwho.co.uk]] chief among them). This problem could be very simply resolved by following our evil twin: as one can see at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Who, Wikipedia uses {{w|Wikipedia:Hatnote|hatnote}} formatting for these templates, and the result can handle more links (our templates are currently capped at 2) while causing no issues. While Epsilon has proposed a thread about this at [[Tardis:Temporary forums]], applying this fix to every instance of {{tlx|for}} across the wiki would be as easy as editing this template page. I believe this is a common-sense change and should be implemented without us having to wait for a forum slot to open up. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 17:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC) | [[User:Epsilon the Eternal|Epsilon]] and [[User:TheGreatGabester|TheGreatGabester]] have identified that the design of our {{tlx|dab page}}, {{tlx|you may}}, and {{tlx|for}} templates is causing severe formatting issues on many of our pages ([[Whoisdoctorwho.co.uk]] chief among them). This problem could be very simply resolved by following our evil twin: as one can see at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Who, Wikipedia uses {{w|Wikipedia:Hatnote|hatnote}} formatting for these templates, and the result can handle more links (our templates are currently capped at 2) while causing no issues. While Epsilon has proposed a thread about this at [[Tardis:Temporary forums]], applying this fix to every instance of {{tlx|for}} across the wiki would be as easy as editing this template page. I believe this is a common-sense change and should be implemented without us having to wait for a forum slot to open up. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 17:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
: I would also like to convert {{tlx|Section stub}} into an indented hatnote - the boxes are currently causing issues on [[Chris Cwej]], especially now that we've finally allowed non-widescreen images. [[User:PintlessMan|PintlessMan]] [[User talk:PintlessMan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:06, 16 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:06, 16 March 2023
Hatnote[[edit]]
Epsilon and TheGreatGabester have identified that the design of our {{dab page}}, {{you may}}, and {{for}} templates is causing severe formatting issues on many of our pages (Whoisdoctorwho.co.uk chief among them). This problem could be very simply resolved by following our evil twin: as one can see at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Who, Wikipedia uses hatnote formatting for these templates, and the result can handle more links (our templates are currently capped at 2) while causing no issues. While Epsilon has proposed a thread about this at Tardis:Temporary forums, applying this fix to every instance of {{for}} across the wiki would be as easy as editing this template page. I believe this is a common-sense change and should be implemented without us having to wait for a forum slot to open up. – n8 (☎) 17:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- I would also like to convert {{Section stub}} into an indented hatnote - the boxes are currently causing issues on Chris Cwej, especially now that we've finally allowed non-widescreen images. PintlessMan ☎ 18:06, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
