User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Help!/@comment-26944294-20150830230800/@comment-1432718-20150831000205: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
To expand on Mewiet's answer, I explained in [[Thread:177648]] that it was decided years ago that cast/crew birth dates '''must be properly sourced'''. Yes, there are still lots of dates on this wiki that have unsourced dates, but another user and I have been working to remove those. Please read the forum thread that I mentioned here to see more information. | To expand on Mewiet's answer, I explained in [[Thread:177648]] that it was decided years ago that cast/crew birth dates '''must be properly sourced'''. Yes, there are still lots of dates on this wiki that have unsourced dates, but another user and I have been working to remove those. Please read the forum thread that I mentioned here to see more information. | ||
This might be a good chance to remind all users that one or more violations of a rule do not make the rule invalid. This is a large wiki, and sometimes mistakes slip through the cracks. | This might be a good chance to remind all users that one or more violations of a rule do not make the rule invalid. This is a large wiki, and sometimes mistakes slip through the cracks. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Help!/20150830230800-26944294/20150831000205-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 12:44, 27 April 2023
To expand on Mewiet's answer, I explained in Thread:177648 that it was decided years ago that cast/crew birth dates must be properly sourced. Yes, there are still lots of dates on this wiki that have unsourced dates, but another user and I have been working to remove those. Please read the forum thread that I mentioned here to see more information.
This might be a good chance to remind all users that one or more violations of a rule do not make the rule invalid. This is a large wiki, and sometimes mistakes slip through the cracks.
