User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Help!/@comment-5675031-20151227050123/@comment-5918438-20151227063146: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes]] may interest you. We do not tend to discuss narrative discontinuity in ns:0 articles, because contradictions occur all the time in such a large and expansive universe as the [[DWU]]. For the purposes of article writing, what a story says is what is valid. If an error is non-narrative, though, like an object that appears in one frame but disappears in the next, then it can go in the "production errors" section of at least every ''TV'' story article. | [[Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes]] may interest you. We do not tend to discuss narrative discontinuity in ns:0 articles, because contradictions occur all the time in such a large and expansive universe as the [[DWU]]. For the purposes of article writing, what a story says is what is valid. If an error is non-narrative, though, like an object that appears in one frame but disappears in the next, then it can go in the "production errors" section of at least every ''TV'' story article. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Help!/20151227050123-5675031/20151227063146-5918438]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 12:57, 27 April 2023
Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes may interest you. We do not tend to discuss narrative discontinuity in ns:0 articles, because contradictions occur all the time in such a large and expansive universe as the DWU. For the purposes of article writing, what a story says is what is valid. If an error is non-narrative, though, like an object that appears in one frame but disappears in the next, then it can go in the "production errors" section of at least every TV story article.
