Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-20607870-20161222105142: Difference between revisions

(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-20607870-20161222105142'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Thefartydoctor wrote:
Thefartydoctor wrote:
Line 8: Line 7:


We don't have to consider all of CTM, just what we see in the DWU as with Death's Head.
We don't have to consider all of CTM, just what we see in the DWU as with Death's Head.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20161222064850-1272640/20161222105142-20607870]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 03:18, 4 May 2023

Thefartydoctor wrote: You must bear in mind one simple thing: 'Call the Midwife is a part of Looking for Pudsey, through the inclusion of Sister Julienne. Redmayne himself phones the character and not the actor. You have to realise that if we include this as valid, then we have to consider the Call the Midwife Universe valid and part of the Whoniverse. As the two are highly incompatible, it's highly unlikely that Whovians will take this lightly haha.

The only thing that could save this story was if Moffat states that Mel and Sue manage to patch Redmayne through from his universe to the DWU... for a silly sketch that was for charity, it's too much hassle haha.

We don't have to consider all of CTM, just what we see in the DWU as with Death's Head.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.