User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-5918438-20161222073739: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (SOTO moved page User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates 1/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-5918438-20161222073739 to User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-5918438-20161222073739 over redirect: I didn't want subpages moved.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please stop removing invalid tags according to your own whims while this discussion is ongoing, or risk a short block per [[Tardis:Do not disrupt this wiki to prove a point]]. | Please stop removing invalid tags according to your own whims while this discussion is ongoing, or risk a short block per [[Tardis:Do not disrupt this wiki to prove a point]]. | ||
(Without responding to everything you have to say, ''Global Conspiracy?'', I do agree, should be considered a valid source. As I said on the talk page. The invalid tag was added by someone who'd never seen it, because someone else added the parodies category. It will likely be switched over. But that's just it -- we deal with these on a case-by-case basis.) | (Without responding to everything you have to say, ''Global Conspiracy?'', I do agree, should be considered a valid source. As I said on the talk page. The invalid tag was added by someone who'd never seen it, because someone else added the parodies category. It will likely be switched over. But that's just it -- we deal with these on a case-by-case basis.) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20161222064850-1272640/20161222073739-5918438]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 03:18, 4 May 2023
Please stop removing invalid tags according to your own whims while this discussion is ongoing, or risk a short block per Tardis:Do not disrupt this wiki to prove a point.
(Without responding to everything you have to say, Global Conspiracy?, I do agree, should be considered a valid source. As I said on the talk page. The invalid tag was added by someone who'd never seen it, because someone else added the parodies category. It will likely be switched over. But that's just it -- we deal with these on a case-by-case basis.)
