User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20191023230311/@comment-1432718-20191115042110: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20191023230311/@comment-1432718-20191115042110'''
I'm about ready to call this series valid, since [[User:Revanvolatrelundar]]'s only reason for classing it invalid was the lack of continuity in the stories. That has never determined validity on this wiki (or it would by a really tiny wiki), so unless someone has information about the licensing of this series or if it's a charity publication, I will soon be closing this as valid.
I'm about ready to call this series valid, since [[User:Revanvolatrelundar]]'s only reason for classing it invalid was the lack of continuity in the stories. That has never determined validity on this wiki (or it would by a really tiny wiki), so unless someone has information about the licensing of this series or if it's a charity publication, I will soon be closing this as valid.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191023230311-1432718/20191115042110-1432718]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:28, 27 April 2023

I'm about ready to call this series valid, since User:Revanvolatrelundar's only reason for classing it invalid was the lack of continuity in the stories. That has never determined validity on this wiki (or it would by a really tiny wiki), so unless someone has information about the licensing of this series or if it's a charity publication, I will soon be closing this as valid.