User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-45692830-20200709020644: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Actually, reviewing the four little rules again, I think I've convinced myself that these comics aren't licensed, at least, not by the metric we care about. | Actually, reviewing the four little rules again, I think I've convinced myself that these comics aren't licensed, at least, not by the metric we care about. | ||
Certainly they're licensed in the sense that people are allowed are allowed to use the assets, but they're probably not allowed to do so ''commercially''. Rule 2 explicitly asks for a ''commercial'' license. And I'm not sure we have that. (I will say that I don't think "commercial license" is a term of art, but I think that's what's meant by the rule.) | Certainly they're licensed in the sense that people are allowed are allowed to use the assets, but they're probably not allowed to do so ''commercially''. Rule 2 explicitly asks for a ''commercial'' license. And I'm not sure we have that. (I will say that I don't think "commercial license" is a term of art, but I think that's what's meant by the rule.) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200505204802-1432718/20200709020644-45692830]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 27 April 2023
Actually, reviewing the four little rules again, I think I've convinced myself that these comics aren't licensed, at least, not by the metric we care about.
Certainly they're licensed in the sense that people are allowed are allowed to use the assets, but they're probably not allowed to do so commercially. Rule 2 explicitly asks for a commercial license. And I'm not sure we have that. (I will say that I don't think "commercial license" is a term of art, but I think that's what's meant by the rule.)
