User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200905235227/@comment-1432718-20200906002907: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
@[[User:Epsilon the Eternal]], note that I did not place an "invalid" tag on the pages in question, so no violating of [[T:BOUND]]. And there are lots of edits/pages that get made under the radar of the few admins; when something comes up, it needs to be addressed. | @[[User:Epsilon the Eternal]], note that I did not place an "invalid" tag on the pages in question, so no violating of [[T:BOUND]]. And there are lots of edits/pages that get made under the radar of the few admins; when something comes up, it needs to be addressed. | ||
I can't speak for other admins, but I have no knowledge of these stories, so I opened the debate '''to get that information'''. Maybe, instead of trying to obscure the debate, editors could actually provide information regarding these stories so that an informed decision can be made? | I can't speak for other admins, but I have no knowledge of these stories, so I opened the debate '''to get that information'''. Maybe, instead of trying to obscure the debate, editors could actually provide information regarding these stories so that an informed decision can be made? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200905235227-1432718/20200906002907-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 27 April 2023
@User:Epsilon the Eternal, note that I did not place an "invalid" tag on the pages in question, so no violating of T:BOUND. And there are lots of edits/pages that get made under the radar of the few admins; when something comes up, it needs to be addressed.
I can't speak for other admins, but I have no knowledge of these stories, so I opened the debate to get that information. Maybe, instead of trying to obscure the debate, editors could actually provide information regarding these stories so that an informed decision can be made?
