User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200905235227/@comment-39988495-20200906002227: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Going to reiterate @[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] - this was a question, that was answered. | Going to reiterate @[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] - this was a question, that was answered. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
Edit: I started writing this reply prior to @[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]]'s comment (the one above the one the above mine), so I might seem as if I'm literally repeating Scrooge, which I wasn't. | Edit: I started writing this reply prior to @[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]]'s comment (the one above the one the above mine), so I might seem as if I'm literally repeating Scrooge, which I wasn't. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200905235227-1432718/20200906002227-39988495]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 27 April 2023
Going to reiterate @Scrooge MacDuck - this was a question, that was answered.
Also of note, isn't this thread in violation of T:BOUND? There's no new evidence to suggest that these should be invalid.
An editor's query about something which is resolved by editors who have read these comics, should never in a million years be interpreted as "evidence".
Edit: I started writing this reply prior to @Scrooge MacDuck's comment (the one above the one the above mine), so I might seem as if I'm literally repeating Scrooge, which I wasn't.
