User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200905235227/@comment-6032121-20200906002740: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
@[[User:Epsilon the Eternal|Epsilon]], I ''think'' the policy about starting inclusion debates without new evidence is [[T:POINT]]? Could be wrong. At any rate, it's for an admin to say whether the discussion is indeed in violation of whatever policy, but I do agree that in the absence of any hard evidence I don't really see what there is for us to talk about here. | @[[User:Epsilon the Eternal|Epsilon]], I ''think'' the policy about starting inclusion debates without new evidence is [[T:POINT]]? Could be wrong. At any rate, it's for an admin to say whether the discussion is indeed in violation of whatever policy, but I do agree that in the absence of any hard evidence I don't really see what there is for us to talk about here. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200905235227-1432718/20200906002740-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:31, 27 April 2023
@Epsilon, I think the policy about starting inclusion debates without new evidence is T:POINT? Could be wrong. At any rate, it's for an admin to say whether the discussion is indeed in violation of whatever policy, but I do agree that in the absence of any hard evidence I don't really see what there is for us to talk about here.
