User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20190903191921/@comment-1432718-20190903233415: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20190903191921/@comment-1432718-20190903233415'''
Something to keep in mind as you argue for inclusion: per [[Tardis:Valid sources]], '''trailers are not considered valid sources'''. Instead of going through the three rules, you have to actually argue that this isn't a trailer.
Something to keep in mind as you argue for inclusion: per [[Tardis:Valid sources]], '''trailers are not considered valid sources'''. Instead of going through the three rules, you have to actually argue that this isn't a trailer.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190903191921-1678571/20190903233415-1432718]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:37, 27 April 2023

Something to keep in mind as you argue for inclusion: per Tardis:Valid sources, trailers are not considered valid sources. Instead of going through the three rules, you have to actually argue that this isn't a trailer.