User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20190903191921/@comment-6032121-20190904110246: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Also, the Sixth Doctor trailer in question features a fictionalized Colin Baker, not the Sixth Doctor. So even if it were otherwise a valid-like narrative it's clearly non-DWU. | Also, the Sixth Doctor trailer in question features a fictionalized Colin Baker, not the Sixth Doctor. So even if it were otherwise a valid-like narrative it's clearly non-DWU. | ||
I wonder, could one dig up similar production info for ''Jo Grant returns''? Perhaps ''it'' has its own title as well, unbeknownst to us. | I wonder, could one dig up similar production info for ''Jo Grant returns''? Perhaps ''it'' has its own title as well, unbeknownst to us. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190903191921-1678571/20190904110246-6032121]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 13:38, 27 April 2023
Also, the Sixth Doctor trailer in question features a fictionalized Colin Baker, not the Sixth Doctor. So even if it were otherwise a valid-like narrative it's clearly non-DWU.
I wonder, could one dig up similar production info for Jo Grant returns? Perhaps it has its own title as well, unbeknownst to us.