User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20190903191921/@comment-6032121-20190904110246: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20190903191921/@comment-6032121-20190904110246'''
Also, the Sixth Doctor trailer in question features a fictionalized Colin Baker, not the Sixth Doctor. So even if it were otherwise a valid-like narrative it's clearly non-DWU.
Also, the Sixth Doctor trailer in question features a fictionalized Colin Baker, not the Sixth Doctor. So even if it were otherwise a valid-like narrative it's clearly non-DWU.


I wonder, could one dig up similar production info for ''Jo Grant returns''? Perhaps ''it'' has its own title as well, unbeknownst to us.
I wonder, could one dig up similar production info for ''Jo Grant returns''? Perhaps ''it'' has its own title as well, unbeknownst to us.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190903191921-1678571/20190904110246-6032121]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:38, 27 April 2023

Also, the Sixth Doctor trailer in question features a fictionalized Colin Baker, not the Sixth Doctor. So even if it were otherwise a valid-like narrative it's clearly non-DWU.

I wonder, could one dig up similar production info for Jo Grant returns? Perhaps it has its own title as well, unbeknownst to us.