User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20200811174238/@comment-39988495-20200811190643: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
czechout wrote:<br> | czechout wrote:<br> | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
Isn't this applicable to all non-TV narrative stories though? | Isn't this applicable to all non-TV narrative stories though? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200811174238-1678571/20200811190643-39988495]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:38, 27 April 2023
czechout wrote:
Not sure what your alternative would be. You'd actually require the admin staff of this wiki to look at every single book ever made and decide on a case-by-case basis? That's completely unreasonable, I think you'd agree. After discussing the matter since 2005, it became abundantly clear that we need a rule that was simple to administer — and that didn't require our administrative staff to outlay huge amounts of cash.
[...]
By contrast we're not getting paid to do this, so we all have to work within our own personal budgets. And if we can't get a copy of a particular book, we can't get a copy of that book. So our rule that "only stories count" is immensely practical. It's something we can enforce without having to buy and sit in judgement upon every single release.
[...]
All rules of the wiki have to be clear and easy to administer.
Isn't this applicable to all non-TV narrative stories though?
