User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20200811174238/@comment-39988495-20200811193157: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20200811174238/@comment-39988495-20200811193157'''
[[Doctor Who: Battles in Time (magazine)|Doctor Who: Battles in Time]] is not a reference book, it's a magazine, not unlike [[Doctor Who Adventures]].  
[[Doctor Who: Battles in Time (magazine)|Doctor Who: Battles in Time]] is not a reference book, it's a magazine, not unlike [[Doctor Who Adventures]].  


So it's a case of "oh this magazine has an narrative story, so the story will of course be valid and the obviously out of universe magazine won't be a valid source".
So it's a case of "oh this magazine has an narrative story, so the story will of course be valid and the obviously out of universe magazine won't be a valid source".
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200811174238-1678571/20200811193157-39988495]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:38, 27 April 2023

Doctor Who: Battles in Time is not a reference book, it's a magazine, not unlike Doctor Who Adventures.

So it's a case of "oh this magazine has an narrative story, so the story will of course be valid and the obviously out of universe magazine won't be a valid source".