User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1827503-20150731042136: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO | Forum Archive | Inclusion debates
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|Inclusion debates/Audio Visuals}} | |||
I have noticed that the [[Audio Visuals]] page doesn't have any invalid source templates for some reason. It fails rule 2 of our four little rules in my opinion, but I want to officially wait for a ruling on the Audio Visuals' validity before jumping the gun. | I have noticed that the [[Audio Visuals]] page doesn't have any invalid source templates for some reason. It fails rule 2 of our four little rules in my opinion, but I want to officially wait for a ruling on the Audio Visuals' validity before jumping the gun. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20150731042136-1827503]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:43, 27 April 2023
I have noticed that the Audio Visuals page doesn't have any invalid source templates for some reason. It fails rule 2 of our four little rules in my opinion, but I want to officially wait for a ruling on the Audio Visuals' validity before jumping the gun.
