User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170416232213: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Updating links from Series 2 (Doctor Who) to Series 2 (Doctor Who 2005)) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The definition of what we call "an advertisement" in the case of something being invalid is not "Any product meant to make you want another product." | The definition of what we call "an advertisement" in the case of something being invalid is not "Any product meant to make you want another product." | ||
Look at the [[Tardisode]]s. Those were all meant to entice you into seeing [[Series 2 (Doctor Who)|series 2]]. Are those ads? Are those invalid on the principal of encouraging the viewer to see another product? | Look at the [[Tardisode]]s. Those were all meant to entice you into seeing [[Series 2 (Doctor Who 2005)|series 2]]. Are those ads? Are those invalid on the principal of encouraging the viewer to see another product? | ||
When it was decided that trailers were not stories, it wasn't done under the idea that we could stretch that definition as far as possible. | When it was decided that trailers were not stories, it wasn't done under the idea that we could stretch that definition as far as possible. | ||
Right now I'm getting both on my computer, and I'm going to try and figure out how it goes and I'll explain it in detail. | Right now I'm getting both on my computer, and I'm going to try and figure out how it goes and I'll explain it in detail. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170416191252-2.26.183.189/20170416232213-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:08, 25 April 2024
The definition of what we call "an advertisement" in the case of something being invalid is not "Any product meant to make you want another product."
Look at the Tardisodes. Those were all meant to entice you into seeing series 2. Are those ads? Are those invalid on the principal of encouraging the viewer to see another product?
When it was decided that trailers were not stories, it wasn't done under the idea that we could stretch that definition as far as possible.
Right now I'm getting both on my computer, and I'm going to try and figure out how it goes and I'll explain it in detail.
