User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170416235528: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Thefartydoctor wrote: | Thefartydoctor wrote: | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
I think it was a short narrative to introduce the companion to the fans, and I think Moffat liked it enough to make it part of the actual narrative. It's a special case, but I don't think I would call it an "Advertisement." | I think it was a short narrative to introduce the companion to the fans, and I think Moffat liked it enough to make it part of the actual narrative. It's a special case, but I don't think I would call it an "Advertisement." | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170416191252-2.26.183.189/20170416235528-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:50, 27 April 2023
Thefartydoctor wrote: What's at the heart of FftF? Throwaway scene without context? Genuine scene from a future episode that hasn't been written yet?
I know I'm retreading ground here, but I would easily compare it to something like Prequel (The Doctor, the Widow and the Wardrobe).
I think it was a short narrative to introduce the companion to the fans, and I think Moffat liked it enough to make it part of the actual narrative. It's a special case, but I don't think I would call it an "Advertisement."
