User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170424152112: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Danniesen wrote: | Danniesen wrote: | ||
Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
I'm sorry, but that sounds like the ''definition'' of a head-canon. We don't cover canon, and if our editors think something is canon isn't relevant to if we cover it. | I'm sorry, but that sounds like the ''definition'' of a head-canon. We don't cover canon, and if our editors think something is canon isn't relevant to if we cover it. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170416191252-2.26.183.189/20170424152112-4028641]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 13:59, 27 April 2023
Danniesen wrote: Idk, it just doesn't seem to be valid in my eyes.
I'm sorry, but that sounds like the definition of a head-canon. We don't cover canon, and if our editors think something is canon isn't relevant to if we cover it.