User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-24894325-20170302225328/@comment-24894325-20170304163123: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Mea culpa. Mea maxima culpa. | Mea culpa. Mea maxima culpa. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
I am very happy that this story was never considered valid as it is clearly not. | I am very happy that this story was never considered valid as it is clearly not. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170302225328-24894325/20170304163123-24894325]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:05, 27 April 2023
Mea culpa. Mea maxima culpa.
I really was simply confused by the contradictory messages in the categories and the lack of the "invalid" tag. I did not mean to open any new debates.
Perhaps, I should have used the Reference section for asking about the decision on inclusion. Maybe, it still makes sense to move this thread to reference section now, in order to avoid the temptation to open more debates on similar topics. Once again I apologise.
I am very happy that this story was never considered valid as it is clearly not.
