User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-31010985-20191009213135: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't see how having a separate page for the 2019 version would be more misleading than attributing screenshots from the 2019 version to the 1965 one. Infoboxes have the "adapted into" and "adapted from" variables and the two versions would be linked to each other in their leads which would explain the situation as well if anybody is confused about a webcast remake of a 1965 story. What part of that is confusing or misleading? | I don't see how having a separate page for the 2019 version would be more misleading than attributing screenshots from the 2019 version to the 1965 one. Infoboxes have the "adapted into" and "adapted from" variables and the two versions would be linked to each other in their leads which would explain the situation as well if anybody is confused about a webcast remake of a 1965 story. What part of that is confusing or misleading? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191009174707-28743561/20191009213135-31010985]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:25, 27 April 2023
I don't see how having a separate page for the 2019 version would be more misleading than attributing screenshots from the 2019 version to the 1965 one. Infoboxes have the "adapted into" and "adapted from" variables and the two versions would be linked to each other in their leads which would explain the situation as well if anybody is confused about a webcast remake of a 1965 story. What part of that is confusing or misleading?
