User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-6032121-20191103133052: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In point of fact, the comparison to ''Shada'' is salient: the final Shada thread ([[Thread:226169]]), due to the specific circumstances, covered not only the matter of ''whether'' to include some of the various versions of ''Shada'', but also how we ''would'' in practical terms include them. It seems an "inclusion debate" ''can'', by precedent, cover the "how" of the inclusion as well as the "whether". Which seems tidier to me than to spread it out over a scattered bunch of discussions. | In point of fact, the comparison to ''Shada'' is salient: the final Shada thread ([[Thread:226169]]), due to the specific circumstances, covered not only the matter of ''whether'' to include some of the various versions of ''Shada'', but also how we ''would'' in practical terms include them. It seems an "inclusion debate" ''can'', by precedent, cover the "how" of the inclusion as well as the "whether". Which seems tidier to me than to spread it out over a scattered bunch of discussions. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191009174707-28743561/20191103133052-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:26, 27 April 2023
In point of fact, the comparison to Shada is salient: the final Shada thread (Thread:226169), due to the specific circumstances, covered not only the matter of whether to include some of the various versions of Shada, but also how we would in practical terms include them. It seems an "inclusion debate" can, by precedent, cover the "how" of the inclusion as well as the "whether". Which seems tidier to me than to spread it out over a scattered bunch of discussions.
