User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191110034322/@comment-31010985-20191110044425: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191110034322/@comment-31010985-20191110044425'''
LegoK9 presents this case thoroughly. It is clear to me at least that the stories outlined should be considered valid both because of the continuity references and the real world evidence of the ''Doctor Who'' strips being reprinted, indicating this is a continuation of a narrative thread set within the DWU.
LegoK9 presents this case thoroughly. It is clear to me at least that the stories outlined should be considered valid both because of the continuity references and the real world evidence of the ''Doctor Who'' strips being reprinted, indicating this is a continuation of a narrative thread set within the DWU.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191110034322-28743561/20191110044425-31010985]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:26, 27 April 2023

LegoK9 presents this case thoroughly. It is clear to me at least that the stories outlined should be considered valid both because of the continuity references and the real world evidence of the Doctor Who strips being reprinted, indicating this is a continuation of a narrative thread set within the DWU.