User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-6032121-20191014105336: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
True, I did say that Borisashton's point "stood", though I wouldn't describe that as agreeing ''enthusiastically''. I just thought it was a valid point yet to be answered, not a be-all-end-all. I can, at any rate, perfectly see where the confusion came from and certainly bear you no ill will for it. It's a random mistake of the sort that one is bound to make with long and twisty debates like this one. | True, I did say that Borisashton's point "stood", though I wouldn't describe that as agreeing ''enthusiastically''. I just thought it was a valid point yet to be answered, not a be-all-end-all. I can, at any rate, perfectly see where the confusion came from and certainly bear you no ill will for it. It's a random mistake of the sort that one is bound to make with long and twisty debates like this one. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Speaking of valid points yet to be answered and of points that stand, though, Amorkuz, I ''still'' would like you to tell us what exactly your argument ''is'' in bringing up all that "are the works self-published?" business. If you're ''not'' angling for a "it's self-published on the Internet so it's fanfic" argument, to what policy is the self-published nature of the work relevant? | Speaking of valid points yet to be answered and of points that stand, though, Amorkuz, I ''still'' would like you to tell us what exactly your argument ''is'' in bringing up all that "are the works self-published?" business. If you're ''not'' angling for a "it's self-published on the Internet so it's fanfic" argument, to what policy is the self-published nature of the work relevant? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190928203157-31010985/20191014105336-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:31, 27 April 2023
True, I did say that Borisashton's point "stood", though I wouldn't describe that as agreeing enthusiastically. I just thought it was a valid point yet to be answered, not a be-all-end-all. I can, at any rate, perfectly see where the confusion came from and certainly bear you no ill will for it. It's a random mistake of the sort that one is bound to make with long and twisty debates like this one.
That being said, and regardless of the status of Borisashton's statement regarding your "misrepresentation" of the dialogue thus far (which it will be up to another administrator to decide), back to the topic at hand:
Speaking of valid points yet to be answered and of points that stand, though, Amorkuz, I still would like you to tell us what exactly your argument is in bringing up all that "are the works self-published?" business. If you're not angling for a "it's self-published on the Internet so it's fanfic" argument, to what policy is the self-published nature of the work relevant?
