User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20200205201848/@comment-31010985-20200205202047: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20200205201848/@comment-31010985-20200205202047'''
I will start by reiterating my support for the full inclusion of these stories, as I have done since the first debate on the matter. It is clear to me that these stories pass all four of our "little rules" outlined at [[T:VALID]].
I will start by reiterating my support for the full inclusion of these stories, as I have done since the first debate on the matter. It is clear to me that these stories pass all four of our "little rules" outlined at [[T:VALID]].
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200205201848-31010985/20200205202047-31010985]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:33, 27 April 2023

I will start by reiterating my support for the full inclusion of these stories, as I have done since the first debate on the matter. It is clear to me that these stories pass all four of our "little rules" outlined at T:VALID.