User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-188432-20130513163207: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-188432-20130513163207'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
JagoAndLitefoot wrote:
JagoAndLitefoot wrote:
Line 5: Line 4:
</div>
</div>
Well, fine.  If we restrict coverage to the behind the scenes section, then that means we're treating that source as invalid.  By restricting to the BTS, we'd be saying that the audio version was {{tlx|notdwu}}.  Although my initial call was just to delete the audio versions outright, I would find {{tlx|notdwu}}-ing them an acceptable compromise.
Well, fine.  If we restrict coverage to the behind the scenes section, then that means we're treating that source as invalid.  By restricting to the BTS, we'd be saying that the audio version was {{tlx|notdwu}}.  Although my initial call was just to delete the audio versions outright, I would find {{tlx|notdwu}}-ing them an acceptable compromise.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20130510140359-37.225.52.51/20130513163207-188432]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:35, 27 April 2023

JagoAndLitefoot wrote: I wouldn't mention the Jason version, except perhaps in a behind the scenes section.

Well, fine. If we restrict coverage to the behind the scenes section, then that means we're treating that source as invalid. By restricting to the BTS, we'd be saying that the audio version was {{notdwu}}. Although my initial call was just to delete the audio versions outright, I would find {{notdwu}}-ing them an acceptable compromise.