User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-5442547-20130515202025: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
All right, I don't agree, but... | All right, I don't agree, but... | ||
Why can't the novelisation policy apply? If it can cover minor contradictions, why can't it cove major ones (and I don't call these major, as long as the story's fundamentally the same)? It's as simple as accepting the bits where it doesn't contradict, and ignoring what does. | Why can't the novelisation policy apply? If it can cover minor contradictions, why can't it cove major ones (and I don't call these major, as long as the story's fundamentally the same)? It's as simple as accepting the bits where it doesn't contradict, and ignoring what does. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20130510140359-37.225.52.51/20130515202025-5442547]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:35, 27 April 2023
All right, I don't agree, but... Why can't the novelisation policy apply? If it can cover minor contradictions, why can't it cove major ones (and I don't call these major, as long as the story's fundamentally the same)? It's as simple as accepting the bits where it doesn't contradict, and ignoring what does.
