User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1272640-20171120025442: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Bwburke94 wrote: | Bwburke94 wrote: | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Yeah, that's where I disagree with you. "Not worth it", in my opinion, is not a good argument. There are plenty of people, myself and OS25 included, who would be willing to help maintain articles. | Yeah, that's where I disagree with you. "Not worth it", in my opinion, is not a good argument. There are plenty of people, myself and OS25 included, who would be willing to help maintain articles. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171120025442-1272640]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:38, 27 April 2023
Bwburke94 wrote:
Pluto2 wrote: I was talking about the DYD thread. And Worlds in Time isn't really a big deal. It's the same story, but some people might get the pieces in a different order. It's still the same planets visited for everyone. What difference does it make since it's the same narrative, but parts are in a different order?
Chronology is enough of a mess already. Allowing WIT would be more trouble than it's worth.
Yeah, that's where I disagree with you. "Not worth it", in my opinion, is not a good argument. There are plenty of people, myself and OS25 included, who would be willing to help maintain articles.
