User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1827503-20171119060447: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There's one other factor to consider. | There's one other factor to consider. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Per this policy, if there is no narrative or a branching narrative, it's invalid and we don't need to discuss it. Yet in the rare cases of a non-branching narrative, discussion is necessary, which is why each game needs to be discussed individually. | Per this policy, if there is no narrative or a branching narrative, it's invalid and we don't need to discuss it. Yet in the rare cases of a non-branching narrative, discussion is necessary, which is why each game needs to be discussed individually. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171119060447-1827503]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:39, 27 April 2023
There's one other factor to consider.
Any story that doesn't have a consistent narrative for all users is not valid. In some cases, the gameplay and the narrative are entirely separate parts of the game, so the narrative never branches.
Per this policy, if there is no narrative or a branching narrative, it's invalid and we don't need to discuss it. Yet in the rare cases of a non-branching narrative, discussion is necessary, which is why each game needs to be discussed individually.
