User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-25117610-20170224230542: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
OttselSpy25 wrote: | OttselSpy25 wrote: | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
But that the problem is that [[Tardis:Valid sources|"''only valid stories can be used to describe an "in-universe" topic''"]]. It doesn't matter '''why''' LEGO Dimensions was deemed invalid on this wiki. It isn't a valid source for any in-universe article. I must admit I am ''much more'' inclined to accept "The LEGO Batman Movie" as a VS now than when this thread began, be we '''can't''' do it because of something stated, explained or mentioned in [[LEGO Dimensions (video game)|LEGO Dimensions]]. | But that the problem is that [[Tardis:Valid sources|"''only valid stories can be used to describe an "in-universe" topic''"]]. It doesn't matter '''why''' LEGO Dimensions was deemed invalid on this wiki. It isn't a valid source for any in-universe article. I must admit I am ''much more'' inclined to accept "The LEGO Batman Movie" as a VS now than when this thread began, be we '''can't''' do it because of something stated, explained or mentioned in [[LEGO Dimensions (video game)|LEGO Dimensions]]. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170224230542-25117610]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:46, 27 April 2023
OttselSpy25 wrote: It was declared invalid because of the minor RPG elements of the game. The narrative itself was deemed entirely valid, and since it is part of the LEGO canon, it is very important to deciding if non-video game Doctor Who products in this range are valid.
Once again: Just because we declare something invalid doesn't mean that we get to pretend that it doesn't exist in discussion. Non-valid doesn't mean non-canon.
But that the problem is that "only valid stories can be used to describe an "in-universe" topic". It doesn't matter why LEGO Dimensions was deemed invalid on this wiki. It isn't a valid source for any in-universe article. I must admit I am much more inclined to accept "The LEGO Batman Movie" as a VS now than when this thread began, be we can't do it because of something stated, explained or mentioned in LEGO Dimensions.
