User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170224224528: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Baker's End is especially a contrived example because Vince Cosmos isn't nearly as relevant to people as the Daleks. | Baker's End is especially a contrived example because Vince Cosmos isn't nearly as relevant to people as the Daleks. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
"Well it's stupid" is not a reasonable explanation of making something invalid. | "Well it's stupid" is not a reasonable explanation of making something invalid. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170224224528-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:47, 27 April 2023
Baker's End is especially a contrived example because Vince Cosmos isn't nearly as relevant to people as the Daleks.
Alright, so to your theoretical example -- would an episode of a cartoon be valid if they featured a licensed crossover that explicitly explained the differences between the two universes and made it clear that the two universes were different?
Pretty much yea. If they were to go that far out of their way to explain why the Daleks are outside of the DWU, then the story is meant to tie-into the DWU.
"Well it's stupid" is not a reasonable explanation of making something invalid.
