User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170305055845: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170305055845'''
I see your point. But your point is the entire point of the thread. I don't think it's a new question. I think it's the only question we've ever been discussing. It's always been "is this DWU the DWU." And I don't see evidence that this isn't the case at all. If they are different universes, I need this to be proven -- considering I've gone down a rather detailed list of reasons that it's meant to be the same world. I don't think I need to prove my point of view any more.
I see your point. But your point is the entire point of the thread. I don't think it's a new question. I think it's the only question we've ever been discussing. It's always been "is this DWU the DWU." And I don't see evidence that this isn't the case at all. If they are different universes, I need this to be proven -- considering I've gone down a rather detailed list of reasons that it's meant to be the same world. I don't think I need to prove my point of view any more.


It is ''definitely'' no longer a game of "Prove that this DWU is ''the'' DWU." The game is now "Prove that this DWU ''isn't'' the DWU." I think I've made a reasonable clear case, and I do not need to prove it any more. I call on anyone else to provide reasonable pieces of evidence or proof that they aren't the same, instead of trying to argue that my argument shouldn't exist. Because I have seen nothing too convincing on that subject as-of yet.
It is ''definitely'' no longer a game of "Prove that this DWU is ''the'' DWU." The game is now "Prove that this DWU ''isn't'' the DWU." I think I've made a reasonable clear case, and I do not need to prove it any more. I call on anyone else to provide reasonable pieces of evidence or proof that they aren't the same, instead of trying to argue that my argument shouldn't exist. Because I have seen nothing too convincing on that subject as-of yet.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170305055845-4028641]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:49, 27 April 2023

I see your point. But your point is the entire point of the thread. I don't think it's a new question. I think it's the only question we've ever been discussing. It's always been "is this DWU the DWU." And I don't see evidence that this isn't the case at all. If they are different universes, I need this to be proven -- considering I've gone down a rather detailed list of reasons that it's meant to be the same world. I don't think I need to prove my point of view any more.

It is definitely no longer a game of "Prove that this DWU is the DWU." The game is now "Prove that this DWU isn't the DWU." I think I've made a reasonable clear case, and I do not need to prove it any more. I call on anyone else to provide reasonable pieces of evidence or proof that they aren't the same, instead of trying to argue that my argument shouldn't exist. Because I have seen nothing too convincing on that subject as-of yet.