User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170224114925: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm going to agree that it would be weird if this was included. But that isn't a reason for a story to be declared invalid. | I'm going to agree that it would be weird if this was included. But that isn't a reason for a story to be declared invalid. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
Also, this could be an alternate universe where everything is LEGO in the DWU, how it fits is not our problem. | Also, this could be an alternate universe where everything is LEGO in the DWU, how it fits is not our problem. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170224114925-5.2.105.85]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:50, 27 April 2023
I'm going to agree that it would be weird if this was included. But that isn't a reason for a story to be declared invalid.
The main question is. Is a licensed cameo, a DWU story?
Also, this could be an alternate universe where everything is LEGO in the DWU, how it fits is not our problem.
