User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-5918438-20170304235401: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Thefartydoctor wrote: | Thefartydoctor wrote: | ||
| Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
But to be perfectly fair, the Doctor has visited so many worlds (and dimensions) with physics far, far stranger than that. | But to be perfectly fair, the Doctor has visited so many worlds (and dimensions) with physics far, far stranger than that. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170304235401-5918438]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:51, 27 April 2023
Thefartydoctor wrote: I'm glad we agree on that latter point.
All I'm saying is your argument makes sense, not that it trumps all other arguments.
AeD wrote: I've not seen the film, but could that not have been a Voldemort from earlier in the timeline of the regular flavour Potterverse?
This Voldemort looks like the Voldemort physically reborn in book 4, and I don't think, before then, Voldemort was capable of unsupported flight. I might have my Potter lore wrong on that one, though.
OttselSpy25 wrote: Rule of thumb: If you could see it in a Rachael Smith comic, it's not good enough to make the story invalid.
Ha, I like this.
AeD wrote: I think the turn-a-bed-into-a-car physics stuff is more than enough to declare it invalid.
But to be perfectly fair, the Doctor has visited so many worlds (and dimensions) with physics far, far stranger than that.
