User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170306172600/@comment-28349479-20190530121626: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A perhaps-relevant quote from the aforementioned [[Tardis talk:Canon policy/Archive 2]]: | A perhaps-relevant quote from the aforementioned [[Tardis talk:Canon policy/Archive 2]]: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
In other words, as long as a story is (1) properly licensed and (2) non-parodic, it shouldn't matter what characters are in it, even if they originate from ''Dimensions in Time'', ''Star Trek: The Next Generation'', or any other invalid story. This is a clear and consistent application of the rules as they currently exist. | In other words, as long as a story is (1) properly licensed and (2) non-parodic, it shouldn't matter what characters are in it, even if they originate from ''Dimensions in Time'', ''Star Trek: The Next Generation'', or any other invalid story. This is a clear and consistent application of the rules as they currently exist. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170306172600-4028641/20190530121626-28349479]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 14:52, 27 April 2023
A perhaps-relevant quote from the aforementioned Tardis talk:Canon policy/Archive 2:
CzechOut wrote: The only sane policy for determining valid sources is one firmly based on out-of-universe considerations only.
(emphasis his)
In other words, as long as a story is (1) properly licensed and (2) non-parodic, it shouldn't matter what characters are in it, even if they originate from Dimensions in Time, Star Trek: The Next Generation, or any other invalid story. This is a clear and consistent application of the rules as they currently exist.