User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170306172600/@comment-31010985-20180918183437: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I was surprised to see that I never chimed in on this debate since I've been following it for a while. Anyway, I completely agree that these sorts of stories should be considered valid for the reasons presented in the original post. | I was surprised to see that I never chimed in on this debate since I've been following it for a while. Anyway, I completely agree that these sorts of stories should be considered valid for the reasons presented in the original post. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170306172600-4028641/20180918183437-31010985]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:52, 27 April 2023
I was surprised to see that I never chimed in on this debate since I've been following it for a while. Anyway, I completely agree that these sorts of stories should be considered valid for the reasons presented in the original post.
