User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170306172600/@comment-9435571-20170707220011: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I entirely agree, the use of elements from an invalid story should not mean that the resulting story is invalid, just that it doesn't make the source automatically valid. It's not as if it's any different from e.g. the Star Trek crossover. If we consider [[Jean-Luc Picard]] to be valid despite from obviously originating from an invalid source based on his appearance in ''Assimilation2'' then I see no reason not to consider [[Cyrian]] valid based on his appearance in ''Rescue'' despite him first appearing in an invalid source. | I entirely agree, the use of elements from an invalid story should not mean that the resulting story is invalid, just that it doesn't make the source automatically valid. It's not as if it's any different from e.g. the Star Trek crossover. If we consider [[Jean-Luc Picard]] to be valid despite from obviously originating from an invalid source based on his appearance in ''Assimilation2'' then I see no reason not to consider [[Cyrian]] valid based on his appearance in ''Rescue'' despite him first appearing in an invalid source. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170306172600-4028641/20170707220011-9435571]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 15:09, 27 April 2023
I entirely agree, the use of elements from an invalid story should not mean that the resulting story is invalid, just that it doesn't make the source automatically valid. It's not as if it's any different from e.g. the Star Trek crossover. If we consider Jean-Luc Picard to be valid despite from obviously originating from an invalid source based on his appearance in Assimilation2 then I see no reason not to consider Cyrian valid based on his appearance in Rescue despite him first appearing in an invalid source.