User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170322025232/@comment-4028641-20171211042900: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I would interject that a second debate would not really be needed -- there's no point to consider if we should cover earlier versions of the same story. We just shouldn't, because those were not printed with the framing of a ''DWU'' story -- but when illustrated as "flashbacks" in the middle of a DWU comic, then we should cover them (but only the version printed in ''TIDH''). | I would interject that a second debate would not really be needed -- there's no point to consider if we should cover earlier versions of the same story. We just shouldn't, because those were not printed with the framing of a ''DWU'' story -- but when illustrated as "flashbacks" in the middle of a DWU comic, then we should cover them (but only the version printed in ''TIDH''). | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170322025232-4028641/20171211042900-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:12, 27 April 2023
I would interject that a second debate would not really be needed -- there's no point to consider if we should cover earlier versions of the same story. We just shouldn't, because those were not printed with the framing of a DWU story -- but when illustrated as "flashbacks" in the middle of a DWU comic, then we should cover them (but only the version printed in TIDH).
