User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20171124185300/@comment-4028641-20171129225205: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Our validity policy is mainly about discussing what stories can be seen as available to be covered. Since the 1990s Shada is deemed as not valid for coverage, then it makes total sense to me that we mention its existence on the Shada page but otherwise dedicate it to the 2017 version. | Our validity policy is mainly about discussing what stories can be seen as available to be covered. Since the 1990s Shada is deemed as not valid for coverage, then it makes total sense to me that we mention its existence on the Shada page but otherwise dedicate it to the 2017 version. | ||
We would, however, have to ban images taken from earlier 'releases' of the TV ''Shada'', given that the latest edit does many different things with some scenes. | We would, however, have to ban images taken from earlier 'releases' of the TV ''Shada'', given that the latest edit does many different things with some scenes. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20171124185300-4028641/20171129225205-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:13, 27 April 2023
Our validity policy is mainly about discussing what stories can be seen as available to be covered. Since the 1990s Shada is deemed as not valid for coverage, then it makes total sense to me that we mention its existence on the Shada page but otherwise dedicate it to the 2017 version.
We would, however, have to ban images taken from earlier 'releases' of the TV Shada, given that the latest edit does many different things with some scenes.
