User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-1789834-20200606135448: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm bowing out here. I've got no idea what's going on and probably never will. | I'm bowing out here. I've got no idea what's going on and probably never will. | ||
*If this is an extract of an unreleased story, it's not valid. It's an extract. Simple. | *If this is an extract of an unreleased story, it's not valid. It's an extract. Simple. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
As I say, I've no idea what's going on so... good luck. | As I say, I've no idea what's going on so... good luck. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200606025128-45314928/20200606135448-1789834]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:15, 27 April 2023
I'm bowing out here. I've got no idea what's going on and probably never will.
- If this is an extract of an unreleased story, it's not valid. It's an extract. Simple.
- If this is a reworked extract, written into a story with a solid storyline, which could standalone, then the debate should move to who allows it validity - four rules, including authorial intent.
As I say, I've no idea what's going on so... good luck.
