User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-31010985-20200510230926: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there any evidence supporting invalidity aside from the debunked notions of canon and the idea that mentioning or depicting ''Doctor Who'' in-universe is an automatic rule 4 fail? | Is there any evidence supporting invalidity aside from the debunked notions of canon and the idea that mentioning or depicting ''Doctor Who'' in-universe is an automatic rule 4 fail? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200510214412-45692830/20200510230926-31010985]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:20, 27 April 2023
Is there any evidence supporting invalidity aside from the debunked notions of canon and the idea that mentioning or depicting Doctor Who in-universe is an automatic rule 4 fail?
