User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-31010985-20200511000747: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think we should consider the end credits part of the narrative just because they've been added in a fun way. | I don't think we should consider the end credits part of the narrative just because they've been added in a fun way. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Yes, this is the first time we've come across something of this kind onscreen but to us, [[Tardis:Neutral point of view|that doesn't matter]]. | Yes, this is the first time we've come across something of this kind onscreen but to us, [[Tardis:Neutral point of view|that doesn't matter]]. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200510214412-45692830/20200511000747-31010985]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:20, 27 April 2023
I don't think we should consider the end credits part of the narrative just because they've been added in a fun way.
Not to sound harsh but we don't (and shouldn't) postpone debates to wait for the input of users who have blocked for violating the wiki's policies. Again, the level of fourth-wall breaking is nothing we haven't seen before. The Thief of Sherwood literally gives zero indication the Doctor was ever anything other than a fictional character yet we consider it valid. I'll note that story also gives a similar description of Planet of Giants to the one you describe above.
Yes, this is the first time we've come across something of this kind onscreen but to us, that doesn't matter.
